Saint Patrick's New York: Defining Desecration
Gencraft Generated Image |
- question identity
- attack identity
- redefine identity (impose deception)
- destroy identity
- replace identity
- question
- attack
- redefine (to deceive)
- destroy
- replace
- Question identity. Are we really made in the image and likeness of God? Am I really who others say I am? 'Who am I?' is reduced to 'what am I?'
- Attack identity. Actions taken may push one to further question his lovability of himself and others. Accessing "easy" definitions, i.e., one-sided ploys that attempt to condition in another an escapist narrative, fuels doubt and determination. Further discovery is stunted by complacency, the satisfaction that one has arrived at a new frontier populated by like individuals who, unbeknownst to the seeker, are also trapped in a cycle of doubt and approaching despair. Drugs, sex and other deceptions are employed in an attempt to alleviate rational confrontation of the problems.
- Redefine identity to effect a fluid state wherein deception becomes practiced and transformation possible. This is the axis in a process that can lead to despair or redemption (if the subject is brought into proximity with real, uncomplicated behaviours).
- Destroy identity in an attempt to alleviate the need to confront pain. "That person (I was previously) no longer exists, ergo I'm free." 'Who I am' is reduced to 'what I am'.
- Replace identity. A substitute - a chimera - is inserted into one's inner dialogue and external conversations. The recycling of supportive micro-identities (e.g., pronouns and terms of address or protocols) contributes to the erosion of objectivity and possibly the destruction of the host.
- model hope, model Christ
- listen and engage questions
- provide perspective, encourage authentic dignity, plant seeds
- foster openness, invite change
- nurture confidence
- offer Jesus Who offers "forgiveness and grace and liberation from the self-destruction to which they were in bondage"
- maintain relationships, sustain friendship
- a grand act of absolution to, in this instant, possibly assuage a mother's guilt for enabling a child's confusion and - perhaps to her unnecessary way of thinking - for her inability to protect her child from abuse by a pedophile. Whether or not a child blames a parent for a perceived dereliction of duty, a parent with any kind of heart will load up on guilt to the point of enabling a child's wayward behaviour in the wake of abuse to sate that parent's need for forgiveness. That guilt can cause a parent to offer approval while ignoring a child's real need for confronting pain and for healing.
- a public canonization to lend both the deceased and his movement credibility.
ed. for length by Gilbert
(T)he controversy surrounding the recent funeral for Cecilia Gentili at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York has been well-documented in the press. Gentili was a transgender prostitute, an atheist, and a misogynist who denied that women’s bodies were of any real relevance.
Our age is not marked so much by disenchantment as by desecration. The culture’s officer class is committed not merely to marginalizing that which previous generations considered sacred. It is committed to its destruction. Disenchantment has passive connotations, a dull, impersonal, somewhat tedious but inevitable process. But desecration speaks to the exultation that active destruction of the holy involves. When Gentili is celebrated as a “great whore” in Spanish by trans rights advocate Liaam Winslet in a eulogy greeted with wild applause, then “desecration” seems the only word that captures both the blasphemy and the exhilaration of the moment.
What is clear is that none of these individuals speaks the language of mourning or loss. These are not words of disenchantment. They are the exultant words of desecration. To quote the commentary at CNN, “Gentili may not have been a believer, but she likely would have delighted in the spectacle at St. Patrick’s Cathedral.”
Yet there is an irony here. Gentili is dead. There are limits to human self-creation. You can pretend your body has no authority. You can kid yourself and other people that you are a woman when you are a man. But you cannot defy your bodily limits indefinitely. Sooner or later, your body has the last word and you will, to use the American idiom, sleep the big sleep.
And that is where the irony becomes tragedy. As a number of individuals associated with the funeral commented to the press, Jesus did not turn people away and even welcomed prostitutes. That is true. But the key thing to remember is that he did not offer them affirmation. He offered them the possibility of forgiveness and grace and liberation from the self-destruction to which they were in bondage. Affirmation of such self-destruction and of rebellion against God is neither loving nor kind. And it too is a form of desecration—the desecration of man, man denied the opportunity to live freely as God intended.
https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2024/02/desecration-at-st-patricks-cathedral
Footnote
Mindful of the need to protect the flock of Christ, and the need to avoid being drawn into future attempts to desecrate holy ground, pastors would do well to review and tighten up their adherence to Canon Law.
Can. 1184
§1. Unless they gave some signs of repentance before death, the following must be deprived of ecclesiastical funerals:
- notorious apostates, heretics, and schismatics;
- those who chose the cremation of their bodies for reasons contrary to Christian faith;
- other manifest sinners who cannot be granted ecclesiastical funerals without public scandal of the faithful.
§2. If any doubt occurs, the local ordinary is to be consulted, and his judgment must be followed.
Can. 1185
Any funeral Mass must also be denied a person who is excluded from ecclesiastical funerals.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your comments will be appreciated and posted if 1) they are on topic and 2) preserve decorum.
Stand by your word. Do not be anonymous. Use a pseudonym.