WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE

I doubt not then but innocence shall make false accusation blush, and tyranny tremble at patience.

LUCIUS ANNAEUS SENECA

Nothing is more honorable than a grateful heart.

Communist or Communionist?


Although the words communist and communionist may sound alike, they belong to utterly different realms.
  1. A communist seeks a society without private property, ordered by material equality and sustained through collective ownership.
  2. A communionist—one who lives the Catholic vision of communio—seeks a society transfigured by grace, ordered by charity, and animated by the inherent dignity of every human person.
The echo between the words only heightens the contrast between the worlds they describe.

For the Catholic, the human person is not a rival but a brother; not a unit of labor but an icon of God.

Communism begins with an anthropology of conflict: history is driven by class struggle, and justice emerges when economic hierarchies are abolished. As Marx famously wrote, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” A communionist begins elsewhere. For the Catholic, the human person is not a rival but a brother; not a unit of labor but an icon of God. St. John Paul II insisted that authentic community arises only when “the human person is the primary and fundamental way for the Church” (Redemptor Hominis). Communion is not built by erasing differences but by sanctifying relationships.

The Church proposes a gifted unity.

Communism proposes a forced unity—an externally imposed sameness meant to secure social harmony. The Church proposes a gifted unity, born of the Holy Spirit, in which persons retain their uniqueness while entering a deeper solidarity. As the early Christians lived it: “They had all things in common” (Acts 2:44), not by coercion but by charity. A communionist shares because love expands the heart; a communist shares because the state demands it.

Communion seeks to reorder society by converting hearts. 

Communism treats religion as an obstacle to liberation. Communion treats Christ as the source of liberation. Communism seeks to reorder society by restructuring ownership. Communion seeks to reorder society by converting hearts. Communism promises a classless world; communion promises a reconciled world.

Communion elevates.

In short, the communist aims for equality by subtraction—removing distinctions, possessions, and privileges. The communionist aims for unity by addition—adding mercy, sacrifice, and mutual belonging. One flattens; the other elevates.

Comments

Popular Posts

Through Thick and Thin: Surfing The Wake Of The Council

The Personal Ordinariates: Unity, Diversity, Harmony.

The Lord in The Liturgy: The Formation Of Intentional And Resilient Christians

Beauty Overcomes Envy: Politics And Liturgy

The Language Of Sacrifice In The Offertory of Divine Worship

Worship Blooms in Truth and Love and Awe

POPE LEO XIV Magnifica Humanitas

Even in the darkest nights, the Lord raises up men and women who refuse to give up, who persevere in doing good, who protect the vulnerable and open pathways to reconciliation. The memory of the saints, righteous people and the oft-forgotten peacemakers, show us that grace does not magically eliminate conflict, but instead it inspires active resistance to evil and an astonishing creativity in doing good” (paragraph 211).

WORDS TO THE WHYS

You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible. Thomas Sowell